Tesla M1060 vs Quadro NVS 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.45no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV44 A2GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 June 2006 (19 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 $1,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed275 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors75 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10048.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2006 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 188 Watt

NVS 285 has 944.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla M1060, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and Tesla M1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Tesla M1060
Tesla M1060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or Tesla M1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.