Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs Quadro NVS 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1501not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.45no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV44 A2GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 June 2006 (19 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240 ×4
Core clock speed275 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors75 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10051.84 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs232 ×4
TMUs480 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm522 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2006 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 600 Watt

NVS 285 has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

Plex 2200 S4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or Quadro Plex 2200 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.