RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Quadro NVS 280 SD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated63
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNV18 C1AD107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 May 2005 (19 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649
Current price$60 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2816
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistors29 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-594x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 280 SD 2
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17901
+894950%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Quadro NVS 280 SD by 894950% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 70 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 SD and RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.