GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs Quadro NVS 280 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 280 PCI with GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, including specs and performance data.

NVS 280 PCI
2003
64 MB DDR, 13 Watt
0.02

1050 3 GB outperforms 280 PCI by a whopping 60350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1553439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.1212.50
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV34 B1GP107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 October 2003 (22 years ago)21 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed275 MHz1392 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1518 MHz
Number of transistors45 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10072.86
Floating-point processing powerno data2.332 TFLOPS
ROPs224
TMUs448
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm145 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s84.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 280 PCI 0.02
GTX 1050 3 GB 12.09
+60350%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 280 PCI 8
Samples: 1
GTX 1050 3 GB 5116
+63850%
Samples: 176

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.02 12.09
Recency 28 October 2003 21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 280 PCI has 476.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 60350% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 280 PCI in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 280 PCI is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 10 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 414 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 280 PCI or GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.