FirePro S9050 vs Quadro NVS 210S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 210S and FirePro S9050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 210S
2003
11 Watt
0.05

S9050 outperforms 210S by a whopping 23340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1541447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.354.00
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameC51Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 December 2003 (22 years ago)7 August 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed425 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors75 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.85100.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs2112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data264 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 210S 0.05
FirePro S9050 11.72
+23340%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 210S 23
Samples: 13
FirePro S9050 4901
+21209%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.05 11.72
Recency 22 December 2003 7 August 2014
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 225 Watt

NVS 210S has 1945.5% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9050, on the other hand, has a 23340% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro S9050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 210S in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Quadro NVS 210S
AMD FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 210S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 210S or FirePro S9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.