Quadro NVS 110M vs Quadro NVS 160M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 160M and Quadro NVS 110M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 160M
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 12 Watt
0.34
+209%

NVS 160M outperforms NVS 110M by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13151474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.040.79
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG98G72
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores87
Core clock speed580 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors210 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate4.6401.200
Floating-point processing power0.0232 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s4.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 160M 0.34
+209%
NVS 110M 0.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 160M 141
+200%
NVS 110M 47

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the NVS 160M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 160M is ahead in 14 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.11
Recency 15 August 2008 1 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 10 Watt

NVS 160M has a 209.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 110M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Quadro NVS 160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Quadro NVS 160M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 160M or Quadro NVS 110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.