Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro NVS 150M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 150M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 150M
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.17
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
24.63
+14388%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 150M by a whopping 14388% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1471254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.3254.52
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG98AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2008 (17 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed530 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors210 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.120129.6
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache16 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%
Valorant 24−27
−14275%
3450−3500
+14275%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−13991%
1550−1600
+13991%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Dota 2 8−9
−14275%
1150−1200
+14275%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−13900%
700−750
+13900%
Valorant 24−27
−14275%
3450−3500
+14275%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Dota 2 8−9
−14275%
1150−1200
+14275%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−13900%
700−750
+13900%
Valorant 24−27
−14275%
3450−3500
+14275%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−13900%
280−290
+13900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−13900%
280−290
+13900%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−13900%
280−290
+13900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14186%
2000−2050
+14186%
Valorant 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−13900%
280−290
+13900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 24.63
Recency 15 August 2008 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

NVS 150M has 250% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14388.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 150M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Quadro NVS 150M
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 50 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 150M or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.