Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro NVS 135M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro NVS 135M with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.
PRO V710 outperforms NVS 135M by a whopping 26008% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1486 | 191 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.91 | 15.11 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
| GPU code name | G86 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 3 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 3456 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 158 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.200 | 432.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0256 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 96 |
| TMUs | 8 | 216 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 54 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 864 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 16 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 54 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 28 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 224 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 594 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.504 GB/s | 504.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−25900%
|
1300−1350
+25900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−24900%
|
750−800
+24900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−25900%
|
1300−1350
+25900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−25614%
|
1800−1850
+25614%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−25942%
|
6250−6300
+25942%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−25900%
|
2600−2650
+25900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−25525%
|
2050−2100
+25525%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−24900%
|
750−800
+24900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−25900%
|
1300−1350
+25900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−25614%
|
1800−1850
+25614%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−25900%
|
1300−1350
+25900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−25942%
|
6250−6300
+25942%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−25525%
|
2050−2100
+25525%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−24900%
|
750−800
+24900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−25900%
|
1300−1350
+25900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−25614%
|
1800−1850
+25614%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−25900%
|
1300−1350
+25900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−25942%
|
6250−6300
+25942%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−24900%
|
500−550
+24900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−25900%
|
3900−3950
+25900%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−25900%
|
260−270
+25900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−24900%
|
500−550
+24900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.12 | 31.33 |
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 3 October 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 28 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 158 Watt |
NVS 135M has 1480% lower power consumption.
PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 26008.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 11100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 135M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
