ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs Quadro NVS 135M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 135M with Radeon HD 5470, including specs and performance data.

NVS 135M
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.12

HD 5470 outperforms 135M by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15061252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.922.59
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG86Cedar
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)13 February 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1680
Core clock speed400 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors210 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2005.200
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS0.104 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.504 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 135M 0.12
ATI HD 5470 0.64
+433%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 135M 50
Samples: 159
ATI HD 5470 268
+436%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Valorant 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 0.64
Recency 9 May 2007 13 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 19 Watt

NVS 135M has 90% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 5470, on the other hand, has a 433% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 5470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 135M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 5470 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 20 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 135M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 135M or Radeon HD 5470, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.