Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro NVS 135M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro NVS 110M Quadro NVS 120M Quadro NVS 130M Quadro NVS 135M Quadro NVS 140M Quadro NVS 150M Quadro NVS 160M
VS
Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 135M and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 135M
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.13

T1200 Mobile outperforms NVS 135M by a whopping 14885% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

NVS 135M NVS 135M
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1434287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8974.19
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed400 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors210 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20091.20
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.504 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−158
1440p-0−133
4K0−181

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−650%
60
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−92.9%
54
+92.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−689%
71
+689%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−67.9%
47
+67.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−14275%
1150−1200
+14275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−311%
37
+311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+47.4%
19
−47.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Hitman 3 6−7
−14067%
850−900
+14067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−14400%
290−300
+14400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+0%
47
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+0%
28
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the NVS 135M is 47% faster.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 135M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 20 tests (30%)
  • there's a draw in 45 tests (68%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.13 19.48
Recency 9 May 2007 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

NVS 135M has 80% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14884.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 135M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Quadro NVS 135M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 135M Quadro NVS 135M
vs
NVS 140M Quadro NVS 140M
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
NVS 135M Quadro NVS 135M
vs
NVS 130M Quadro NVS 130M
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
G 205M GeForce G 205M
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
9300M G GeForce 9300M G
vs
ATI HD 2400 Radeon HD 2400
ATI Mobility HD 3450 Mobility Radeon HD 3450
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
8400M GS GeForce 8400M GS
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
8200M G GeForce 8200M G
vs
Go 6100 + nForce Go 430 GeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
Go 7400 GeForce Go 7400
vs
7200 GS GeForce 7200 GS
FX 350M Quadro FX 350M
vs
NVS 110M Quadro NVS 110M
NVS 120M Quadro NVS 120M
vs
GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 20 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 135M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 144 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.