PlayStation 4 GPU vs Quadro NVS 135M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG86Liverpool
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)24 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161152
Core clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20057.60
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed594 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.504 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1*
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 24 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 135M has 650% lower power consumption.

PlayStation 4 GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 135M and PlayStation 4 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation card while PlayStation 4 GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Quadro NVS 135M
AMD PlayStation 4 GPU
PlayStation 4 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 20 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 135M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 400 votes

Rate PlayStation 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.