ION vs Quadro NVS 135M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro NVS 135M with ION, including specs and performance data.
ION outperforms 135M by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1506 | 1424 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | G86 | C79 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 18 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 314 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.200 | 3.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0256 TFLOPS | 0.0352 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 16 KB | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 594 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.504 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−108%
|
50−55
+108%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−12
−90.9%
|
21−24
+90.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−100%
|
16−18
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−108%
|
50−55
+108%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−100%
|
16−18
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−108%
|
50−55
+108%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−114%
|
30−33
+114%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.12 | 0.26 |
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 18 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 20 Watt |
NVS 135M has 100% lower power consumption.
ION, on the other hand, has a 117% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 23% more advanced lithography process.
The ION is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 135M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation graphics card while ION is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
