HD Graphics P4600 vs Quadro NVS 135M

Place in the ranking	1439	971
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.91	1.29
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code name	G86	Haswell GT2
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	160
Core clock speed	400 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	84 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.200	24.00
Floating-point processing power	0.0256 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	2
TMUs	8	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	594 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	9.504 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 135M 0.13

HD Graphics P4600 1.55
+1092%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 135M 50

HD Graphics P4600 605
+1110%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
World of Tanks	10−11 −1000%	110−120 +1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−900%

10−11
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Valorant	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Dota 2	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Dota 2	14−16 −1033%	170−180 +1033%
Valorant	0−1	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.13	1.55
Recency	9 May 2007	1 June 2013
Chip lithography	80 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	84 Watt

NVS 135M has 740% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4600, on the other hand, has a 1092.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 263.6% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 135M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 135M is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.