Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Quadro NVS 130M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 130M with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

NVS 130M
2007
256 MB DDR2, 10 Watt
0.25

RX 6600 XT outperforms NVS 130M by a whopping 17044% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135991
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.02
Power efficiency1.7118.36
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG86Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speed400 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors210 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600331.4
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 130M 0.25
RX 6600 XT 42.86
+17044%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 130M 97
RX 6600 XT 16515
+16926%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1135
1440p-0−175
4K-0−144

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.81
1440pno data5.05
4Kno data8.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3850%
79
+3850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3875%
150−160
+3875%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−375%
130−140
+375%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2075%
170−180
+2075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5125%
209
+5125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−878%
85−90
+878%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−375%
130−140
+375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4200%
85−90
+4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3350%
69
+3350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2400%
100
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1863%
157
+1863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4475%
183
+4475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1000%
99
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−118%
61
+118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40
Hitman 3 6−7
−1017%
67
+1017%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5700%
116
+5700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 28

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 129
+0%
129
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 106
+0%
106
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+0%
118
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 33
+0%
33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24
+0%
24
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 42.86
Recency 9 May 2007 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 160 Watt

NVS 130M has 1500% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 17044% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 130M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 130M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4335 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.