GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs Quadro NVS 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1430not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG86GT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)17 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8240 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60051.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs480 ×2
L2 Cache16 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed700 MHz1152 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s147.5 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 17 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 315 Watt

NVS 130M has 3050% lower power consumption.

GTX 285 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 130M and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 130M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 X2
GeForce GTX 285 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 130M or GeForce GTX 285 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.