Radeon R7 M465X vs GeForce 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200M G and Radeon R7 M465X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8200M G
2008
0.15

R7 M465X outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 2733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1480715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLTropo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)15 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data29.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8200M G 0.15
R7 M465X 4.25
+2733%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8200M G 65
Samples: 366
R7 M465X 1786
+2648%
Samples: 15

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
Valorant 24−27
−2608%
650−700
+2608%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 8−9
−2650%
220−230
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Valorant 24−27
−2608%
650−700
+2608%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 8−9
−2650%
220−230
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2614%
190−200
+2614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Valorant 24−27
−2608%
650−700
+2608%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Valorant 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 4.25
Recency 3 June 2008 15 May 2016
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

R7 M465X has a 2733.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M465X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
AMD Radeon R7 M465X
Radeon R7 M465X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Radeon R7 M465X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.