XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.84no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)XG4 (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG72XG40
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)15 September 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.2002.800 ×2
ROPs24 ×2
TMUs48 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s32 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 15 September 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm

NVS 110M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 110M and XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M
XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra
Volari Duo V8 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 26 votes

Rate XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.