FirePro W4000 vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.84no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG72Pitcairn
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7768
Core clock speed300 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20039.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs448
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data183 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 7 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 110M has 650% lower power consumption.

FirePro W4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 110M and FirePro W4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro W4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M
AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or FirePro W4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.