UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Quadro NVS 110M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro NVS 110M with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.
Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms 110M by a whopping 3491% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1510 | 748 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.85 | no data |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | G72 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2006 (19 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 112 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 1.200 | no data |
| ROPs | 2 | no data |
| TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 16 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3300%
|
170−180
+3300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3300%
|
170−180
+3300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−125%
|
50−55
+125%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−610%
|
70−75
+610%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−325%
|
34
+325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3300%
|
170−180
+3300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−125%
|
50−55
+125%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−288%
|
31
+288%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3300%
|
170−180
+3300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−3442%
|
850−900
+3442%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−3400%
|
70−75
+3400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs performs better in 18 tests (46%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (54%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 3.95 |
| Recency | 1 June 2006 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 3490.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
