ATI Radeon 9600 vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 110M with Radeon 9600, including specs and performance data.

NVS 110M
2006
512 MB DDR, 10 Watt
0.11
+37.5%

110M outperforms 9600 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15121527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.850.51
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG72RV350
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speed300 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2001.296
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz189 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s6.048 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 110M 0.11
+37.5%
ATI 9600 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 110M 47
+34.3%
Samples: 101
ATI 9600 35
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.08
Recency 1 June 2006 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 12 Watt

NVS 110M has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 44% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Quadro NVS 110M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9600 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 144 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or Radeon 9600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.