RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro NVS 110M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 110M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 110M
2006
512 MB DDR, 10 Watt
0.11

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms 110M by a whopping 32191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1504154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.8554.79
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG72AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores73072
Core clock speed300 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors112 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200203.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 110M 0.11
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 35.52
+32191%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 110M 47
Samples: 101
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 14924
+31653%
Samples: 1557

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−31567%
950−1000
+31567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−32043%
2250−2300
+32043%
Valorant 24−27
−31983%
7700−7750
+31983%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−31900%
3200−3250
+31900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−31775%
2550−2600
+31775%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−31567%
950−1000
+31567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−32043%
2250−2300
+32043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
Valorant 24−27
−31983%
7700−7750
+31983%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−31775%
2550−2600
+31775%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−31567%
950−1000
+31567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−32043%
2250−2300
+32043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
Valorant 24−27
−31983%
7700−7750
+31983%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−32043%
4500−4550
+32043%
Valorant 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 35.52
Recency 1 June 2006 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 110M has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 32190.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 43 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.