HD Graphics 405 vs Quadro NVS 110M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro NVS 110M with HD Graphics 405, including specs and performance data.
HD Graphics 405 outperforms NVS 110M by a whopping 527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1490 | 1211 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 8.77 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) |
| GPU code name | G72 | Braswell GT1 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2006 (19 years ago) | 1 April 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 112 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.200 | 9.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.1536 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 2 |
| TMUs | 4 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−650%
| 15
+650%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−16.7%
|
27−30
+16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−16.7%
|
27−30
+16.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−16.7%
|
27−30
+16.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how NVS 110M and HD Graphics 405 compete in popular games:
- HD Graphics 405 is 650% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 405 is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics 405 performs better in 20 tests (65%)
- there's a draw in 11 tests (35%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 0.69 |
| Recency | 1 June 2006 | 1 April 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
HD Graphics 405 has a 527.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
The HD Graphics 405 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 405 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
