GeForce 9200M vs Quadro NVS 110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 110M with GeForce 9200M, including specs and performance data.

NVS 110M
2006
512 MB DDR, 10 Watt
0.11

9200M outperforms 110M by a whopping 209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15031346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.852.20
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG72C79
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores716
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2003.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 110M 0.11
GeForce 9200M 0.34
+209%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 110M 47
Samples: 101
GeForce 9200M 143
+204%
Samples: 51

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Valorant 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.34
Recency 1 June 2006 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 12 Watt

NVS 110M has 20% lower power consumption.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has a 209.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9200M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Quadro NVS 110M
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 110M or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.