Radeon R7 M465 vs Quadro M620

Place in performance ranking	509	755
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.49	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	GM107	Litho XT
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	$1958	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	384
Core clock speed	1018 MHz	825 MHz
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	960 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	31.26	27.00
Floating-point performance	no data	864.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M620 and Radeon R7 M465 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.24
+155%

R7 M465 2.84

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M620 2798
+156%

R7 M465 1095

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 156% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M620 3130
+79.9%

R7 M465 1740

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 80% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M620 22120
+80.6%

R7 M465 12250

Quadro M620 outperforms Radeon R7 M465 by 81% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	23 +156%	9−10 −156%
4K	16 +167%	6−7 −167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	no data
Far Cry 5	10−12	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	no data
Hitman 3	10−12	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	no data
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5	no data
Forza Horizon 4	8−9	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	no data