GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI vs Quadro M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking606not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.97no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameGM107G71M
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)12 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51264
Core clock speed756 MHz16 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate31.26no data
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2x512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12GDDR3
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 12 October 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 90 Watt

Quadro M620 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M620 and GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 212 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M620 or GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.