Radeon PRO W7700 vs Quadro M600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M600M with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M600M
2015
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
5.43

PRO W7700 outperforms M600M by a whopping 967% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61942
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.92
Power efficiency12.7921.55
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed837 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate14.02499.2
Floating-point processing power0.6728 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M600M 5.43
PRO W7700 57.92
+967%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M600M 2171
PRO W7700 23154
+967%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−959%
180−190
+959%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.55

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−943%
240−250
+943%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−943%
240−250
+943%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Fortnite 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%
Valorant 60−65
−932%
650−700
+932%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−943%
240−250
+943%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−956%
950−1000
+956%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Dota 2 40−45
−923%
450−500
+923%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Fortnite 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−900%
140−150
+900%
Valorant 60−65
−932%
650−700
+932%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−945%
230−240
+945%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Dota 2 40−45
−923%
450−500
+923%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−942%
250−260
+942%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−950%
210−220
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−963%
85−90
+963%
Valorant 60−65
−932%
650−700
+932%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Valorant 55−60
−917%
600−650
+917%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Valorant 24−27
−938%
270−280
+938%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

This is how Quadro M600M and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 959% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.43 57.92
Recency 18 August 2015 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 190 Watt

Quadro M600M has 533.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 966.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Quadro M600M
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Quadro M600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M600M or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.