Radeon PRO W7700 vs Quadro M600M

Place in performance ranking	565	46
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.21	23.77
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 32
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$103	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 640% better value for money than Quadro M600M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	3072
Core clock speed	837 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.02	499.2
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M600M and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort 2.1
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M600M 5.63

PRO W7700 52.37
+830%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Quadro M600M by 830% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M600M 2177

PRO W7700 20263
+831%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Quadro M600M by 831% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−782%

150−160
+782%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
−789%

80−85

+789%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Hitman 3	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
Hitman 3	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −829%	130−140 +829%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −823%	120−130 +823%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −795%	170−180 +795%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −775%	70−75 +775%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Hitman 3	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −789%	80−85 +789%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Hitman 3	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −829%	65−70 +829%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

This is how Quadro M600M and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 782% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.63	52.37
Recency	2 October 2015	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	190 Watt