Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Quadro M6000

Place in performance ranking	168	26
Place by popularity	not in top-100	94
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.21	28.75
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GM200	Navi 32
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	21 March 2015 (9 years ago)	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,199.99	$579
Current price	$1792 (0.4x MSRP)	$669 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 363% better value for money than Quadro M6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	3840
Core clock speed	988 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.9	604.8
Floating-point performance	6,844 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	19500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	317.4 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M6000 30.57

RX 7800 XT 62.36
+104%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms Quadro M6000 by 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M6000 11805

RX 7800 XT 24081
+104%

Radeon RX 7800 XT outperforms Quadro M6000 by 104% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −108%	208 +108%
1440p	60−65 −105%	123 +105%
4K	35−40 −111%	74 +111%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

120−130

−115%

258
+115%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −109%	178 +109%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −116%	100−110 +116%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −108%	190−200 +108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −107%	110−120 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 −114%	193 +114%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −116%	150−160 +116%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −114%	278 +114%
Hitman 3	55−60 −113%	110−120 +113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 −106%	474 +106%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −114%	130−140 +114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −120%	120−130 +120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 −112%	488 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −106%	196 +106%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −116%	162 +116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −116%	100−110 +116%
Battlefield 5	95−100 −108%	190−200 +108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −107%	110−120 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −115%	161 +115%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −116%	150−160 +116%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −112%	200−210 +112%
Hitman 3	55−60 −113%	110−120 +113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −118%	260−270 +118%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −131%	81 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −120%	120−130 +120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 −109%	398 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 −115%	366 +115%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −112%	120−130 +112%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −117%	130 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −116%	100−110 +116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −107%	110−120 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −111%	148 +111%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −105%	110−120 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −122%	222 +122%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −111%	274 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 −113%	340 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 −111%	200 +111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −107%	145 +107%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−120%

120−130

+120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −115%	140−150 +115%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −114%	130−140 +114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −116%	119 +116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −117%	75−80 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −118%	95−100 +118%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −116%	97 +116%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −115%	161 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −113%	202 +113%
Hitman 3	40−45 −123%	85−90 +123%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −117%	217 +117%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −111%	148 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −121%	243 +121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −110%	147 +110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −109%	115 +109%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
−110%

100−110

+110%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −109%	70−75 +109%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −126%	60−65 +126%
Hitman 3	24−27 −121%	50−55 +121%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −104%	90−95 +104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −110%	84 +110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −115%	118 +115%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −123%	89 +123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −119%	45−50 +119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −110%	44 +110%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −105%	40−45 +105%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −105%	164 +105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −118%	131 +118%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −124%	112 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −123%	67 +123%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−113%

60−65
+113%

This is how Quadro M6000 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 108% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 105% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 111% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.57	62.36
Recency	21 March 2015	25 August 2023
Cost	$4199.99	$579
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	263 Watt