Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs Quadro M6000

Place in performance ranking	169	157
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	5.81	53.36
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM200	Navi 10
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 March 2015 (9 years ago)	4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,199.99	no data
Current price	$1792 (0.4x MSRP)	$457

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5700 XT has 818% better value for money than Quadro M6000.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2560
Core clock speed	988 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	1499 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.9	239.8
Floating-point performance	6,844 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	317.4 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M6000 30.46

Pro 5700 XT 32.58
+7%

Radeon Pro 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M6000 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M6000 11792

Pro 5700 XT 12613
+7%

Radeon Pro 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M6000 by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	30.46	32.58
Recency	21 March 2015	4 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	130 Watt