GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Max-Q GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.48
+5.1%

M6000 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking180192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.27100.00
Power efficiency8.5125.29
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 2958% better value for money than Quadro M6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721536
Core clock speed988 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate213.9152.6
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs19296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+3.4%
87
−3.4%
1440p60−65
+3.4%
58
−3.4%
4K35−40
+2.9%
34
−2.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p46.672.63
1440p70.003.95
4K120.006.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+0%
80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+0%
66
+0%
Battlefield 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+0%
304
+0%
Hitman 3 77
+0%
77
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 209
+0%
209
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 155
+0%
155
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 225
+0%
225
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+0%
125
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+0%
49
+0%
Battlefield 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+0%
256
+0%
Hitman 3 74
+0%
74
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 207
+0%
207
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+0%
118
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+0%
214
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+0%
53
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hitman 3 63
+0%
63
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
+0%
90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+0%
80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+0%
46
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+0%
36
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+0%
32
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+0%
182
+0%
Hitman 3 41
+0%
41
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
+0%
203
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hitman 3 25
+0%
25
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+0%
19
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+0%
13
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M6000 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M6000 is 3% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M6000 is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.48 29.00
Recency 21 March 2015 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M6000 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
GT 420M GeForce GT 420M
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
ATI 7000 Radeon 7000
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
NVS 315 NVS 315
vs
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
R7 M265 Radeon R7 M265
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
HD 6775G2 Radeon HD 6775G2
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
8800M GTX GeForce 8800M GTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 148 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1556 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.