Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

M6000 24 GB
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.79
+313%

M6000 24 GB outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking166501
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.37no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGM200Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 March 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data
Current price$2104 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307280
Core clock speed988 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate285.2no data
Floating-point performance6,844 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M6000 24 GB and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6612 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA5.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+289%
18
−289%
1440p40−45
+300%
10
−300%
4K60−65
+300%
15
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+293%
14
−293%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+295%
19
−295%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+309%
21−24
−309%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+285%
13
−285%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+289%
35−40
−289%
Hitman 3 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+306%
32
−306%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+295%
38
−295%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+300%
30
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+306%
16
−306%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+309%
21−24
−309%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+300%
10
−300%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+289%
35−40
−289%
Hitman 3 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+312%
30−35
−312%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+300%
25
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+296%
24
−296%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+309%
22
−309%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+308%
49
−308%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+275%
8
−275%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+289%
35−40
−289%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+300%
20
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+309%
11
−309%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+279%
27−30
−279%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+305%
21−24
−305%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+275%
12
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%
Hitman 3 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+306%
16
−306%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+300%
10
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Hitman 3 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%

This is how M6000 24 GB and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • M6000 24 GB is 289% faster in 1080p
  • M6000 24 GB is 300% faster in 1440p
  • M6000 24 GB is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.79 7.45
Recency 5 March 2016 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

The Quadro M6000 24 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 24 GB is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 819 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.