GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

M6000 24 GB
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.80
+1.2%

M6000 24 GB outperforms RTX 2060 Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking178181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.78no data
Power efficiency8.5618.40
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 March 2016 (8 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721920
Core clock speed988 MHz960 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate285.2144.0
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs256120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−2%
102
+2%
1440p60−65
−5%
63
+5%
4K35−40
−11.4%
39
+11.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.99no data
1440p83.32no data
4K142.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 91
+0%
91
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+0%
71
+0%
Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 366
+0%
366
+0%
Hitman 3 83
+0%
83
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 223
+0%
223
+0%
Metro Exodus 130
+0%
130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+0%
148
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+0%
227
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 107
+0%
107
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280
+0%
280
+0%
Hitman 3 75
+0%
75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 196
+0%
196
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+0%
123
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190
+0%
190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+0%
88
+0%
Hitman 3 66
+0%
66
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 94
+0%
94
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+0%
38
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 246
+0%
246
+0%
Hitman 3 46
+0%
46
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210
+0%
210
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30
+0%
30
+0%
Hitman 3 28
+0%
28
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+0%
25
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+0%
22
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
+0%
20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how M6000 24 GB and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.80 30.44
Recency 5 March 2016 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

M6000 24 GB has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 117.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M6000 24 GB and GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 24 GB is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
Quadro 5010M Quadro 5010M
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
vs
PG506-232 PG506 232
ATI HD 2400 XT Radeon HD 2400 XT
vs
6150 SE + nForce 430 GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430
ATI Xenos Falcon Xenos Falcon
vs
RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050
ATI HD 5870 Radeon HD 5870
vs
ATI HD 4730 Radeon HD 4730
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
HD 6830M Radeon HD 6830M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile
ATI VE PCI Radeon VE PCI
vs
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
A30 PCIe A30 PCIe
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 16 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1656 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.