Radeon R9 M375X vs Quadro M5500

Aggregate performance score

Quadro M5500
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
20.47
+358%

Quadro M5500 outperforms Radeon R9 M375X by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking253625
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.780.16
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Tropo
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date4 April 2016 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price$1700 $448

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M5500 has 1638% better value for money than R9 M375X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Compute unitsno data10
Core clock speed1139 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1140 MHz1015 MHz
Number of transistors5200 Million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate149.140.60
Floating-point performanceno data1,299 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5500 and Radeon R9 M375X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6606 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinityno data1
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data+
PowerTuneno data+
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan+no data
Mantleno data+
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5500 20.47
+358%
R9 M375X 4.47

Quadro M5500 outperforms Radeon R9 M375X by 358% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M5500 7915
+358%
R9 M375X 1727

Quadro M5500 outperforms Radeon R9 M375X by 358% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+375%
12−14
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
Hitman 3 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+392%
12−14
−392%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+375%
12−14
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
Hitman 3 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+392%
12−14
−392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+400%
9−10
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Hitman 3 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Hitman 3 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.47 4.47
Recency 4 April 2016 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB

The Quadro M5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M375X in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5500 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon R9 M375X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Radeon R9 M375X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 34 votes

Rate Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 23 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M375X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.