GeForce2 MX vs Quadro M5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3221598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.65no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGM204NV11 A2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date8 April 2016 (9 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1140 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1165 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate149.10.7
Floating-point processing power4.772 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1284
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX127.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M5500 7915
+395650%
Samples: 3
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Fortnite 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Fortnite 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 180−190 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Dota 2 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 April 2016 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

Quadro M5500 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M5500 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M5500 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce2 MX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 41 votes

Rate Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M5500 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.