GeForce2 MX vs Quadro M5000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	353	1603
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.95	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GM204	NV11 A2
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 August 2015 (10 years ago)	28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,536	no data
Core clock speed	975 MHz	175 MHz
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,200 million	20 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	93.60	0.7
Floating-point processing power	2.995 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	2
TMUs	96	4
L1 Cache	576 KB	no data
L2 Cache	2 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	SDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	2.656 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x VGA
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	7.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

84

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	18 August 2015	28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	180 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---