H200 SXM 141 GB vs Quadro M5000
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 231 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.21 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.27 | no data |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | Hopper (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | GH100 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 18 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 16896 |
| Core clock speed | 861 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1980 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 80,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 132.9 | 1,045 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.252 TFLOPS | 66.91 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 24 |
| TMUs | 128 | 528 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 528 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | SXM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | 256 Bit | HBM3e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 141 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 5120 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1653 MHz | 1313 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 211 GB/s | 3.36 TB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | no data |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | + | no data |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | + | no data |
| nView Desktop Management | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | N/A |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 9.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2015 | 18 November 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 141 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 700 Watt |
Quadro M5000 has 366.7% lower power consumption.
H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1662.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro M5000 and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
