GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking280not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.33no data
Power efficiency11.53no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM204GT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2015 (10 years ago)12 July 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed861 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate132.94.160
Floating-point processing power4.252 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1288
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2" (5.1 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitDDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.21.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2015 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro M5000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS Rev. 3, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M5000 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 83 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M5000 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.