Riva TNT vs Quadro M4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.16no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGM204NV4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 August 2015 (10 years ago)23 March 1998 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,280no data
Core clock speed975 MHz90 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million7 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate78.000.18
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs802
L1 Cache480 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz110 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s1.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX125.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2015 23 March 1998
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm

M4000M has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M4000M and Riva TNT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Riva TNT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 161 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 87 votes

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000M or Riva TNT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.