Radeon HD 8750A vs Quadro M4000M

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	310	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	3.37	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	GM204	Mars
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	2 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$832	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,280	384
Core clock speed	975 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1013 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,200 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.00	14.40
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops	460.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 8750A compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	no data	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	no data

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	2 October 2015	2 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	45 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---