ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition vs Quadro M4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking398not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.18no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGM204R360
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date18 August 2015 (10 years ago)4 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,280no data
Core clock speed975 MHz378 MHz
Boost clock speed1013 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate78.003.024
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs808
L1 Cache480 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz338 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s21.63 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2015 4 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 60 Watt

M4000M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M4000M and Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 161 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000M or Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.