ATI Radeon 9600 XT vs Quadro M4000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with Radeon 9600 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015, $791
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
15.95
+19838%

M4000 outperforms 9600 XT by a whopping 19838% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3691529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.41no data
Power efficiency10.230.28
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGM204RV360
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2015 (10 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1664no data
Core clock speed773 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate80.392.000
Floating-point processing power2.573 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1044
L1 Cache624 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M4000 15.95
+19838%
ATI 9600 XT 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M4000 6678
+18980%
Samples: 2195
ATI 9600 XT 35
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.95 0.08
Recency 29 June 2015 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 22 Watt

Quadro M4000 has a 19838% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 XT, on the other hand, has 445% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9600 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 285 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 53 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M4000 or Radeon 9600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.