Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro M4000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.29
+83.4%

Quadro M4000 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking297436
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.22no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGM204Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data
Current price$314 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166496
Core clock speed773 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate80.39no data
Floating-point performance2,573 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6008 MHzno data
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereono data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model5no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA5.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+73.1%
26
−73.1%
1440p27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
4K21−24
+75%
12
−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+75%
20
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+81.8%
22
−81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+66.7%
21
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+80.6%
36
−80.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+73.9%
45−50
−73.9%
Hitman 3 40−45
+66.7%
24
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+73.9%
46
−73.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+71.4%
35
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+76.5%
17
−76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+71.1%
38
−71.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+81.8%
22
−81.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+66.7%
18
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+71.9%
32
−71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+73.9%
45−50
−73.9%
Hitman 3 40−45
+81.8%
22
−81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+78.6%
112
−78.6%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+78.6%
28
−78.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+80%
15
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+83.3%
30
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+83.3%
30
−83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+78.6%
84
−78.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+73.9%
23
−73.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+63.6%
11
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+81.8%
21−24
−81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+73.9%
45−50
−73.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+73.9%
23
−73.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+66.7%
24
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+76.5%
30−35
−76.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+75%
20−22
−75%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

This is how Quadro M4000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M4000 is 73% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M4000 is 69% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M4000 is 75% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.29 9.43
Recency 29 June 2015 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 28 Watt

The Quadro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 219 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 822 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.