GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Quadro M4000

Place in the ranking	317	5
Place by popularity	not in top-100	91
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.90	48.93
Power efficiency	9.98	20.00
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM204	AD104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$791	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti has 729% better value for money than Quadro M4000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1664	7680
Core clock speed	773 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.39	626.4
Floating-point processing power	2.573 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	104	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm	285 mm
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 192 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync	no data
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M4000 17.36

RTX 4070 Ti 82.62
+376%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M4000 6677

RTX 4070 Ti 31770
+376%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −413%	231 +413%
1440p	30−35 −400%	150 +400%
4K	18−21 −433%	96 +433%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	17.58 −408%	3.46 +408%
1440p	26.37 −395%	5.33 +395%
4K	43.94 −428%	8.32 +428%

RTX 4070 Ti has 408% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti has 395% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti has 428% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	236 +0%	236 +0%
Elden Ring	269 +0%	269 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	109 +0%	109 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	575 +0%	575 +0%
Metro Exodus	173 +0%	173 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	93 +0%	93 +0%
Dota 2	205 +0%	205 +0%
Elden Ring	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Far Cry 5	152 +0%	152 +0%
Fortnite	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	473 +0%	473 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	178 +0%	178 +0%
Metro Exodus	163 +0%	163 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	83 +0%	83 +0%
Dota 2	243 +0%	243 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	410 +0%	410 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	156 +0%	156 +0%
Elden Ring	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	156 +0%	156 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	53 +0%	53 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	280 +0%	280 +0%
Metro Exodus	148 +0%	148 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Valorant	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	172 +0%	172 +0%
Elden Ring	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	172 +0%	172 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	172 +0%	172 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24 +0%
Dota 2	226 +0%	226 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140 +0%	140 +0%
Valorant	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

This is how Quadro M4000 and RTX 4070 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti is 413% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti is 400% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti is 433% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.36	82.62
Recency	29 June 2015	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	285 Watt

Quadro M4000 has 137.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 375.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.