FirePro D700 vs Quadro M4000
Aggregated performance score
Quadro M4000 outperforms FirePro D700 by 25% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 291 | 346 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 10.42 | 5.04 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 June 2015 (8 years old) | 18 January 2014 (10 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | no data |
| Current price | $314 (0.4x MSRP) | $413 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro M4000 has 107% better value for money than FirePro D700.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1664 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 80.39 | 108.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 279 mm |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5480 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 192 GB/s | 263.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | no data |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | + | no data |
| nView Desktop Management | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 17.27 | 13.83 |
| Recency | 29 June 2015 | 18 January 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 274 Watt |
The Quadro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
