Tesla K80m vs Quadro M3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking416not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.60no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGM204GK210
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date18 August 2015 (10 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,0242x 2496
Core clock speed1050 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data824 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate67.202x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322x 48
TMUs642x 208
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212.0 (11_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 August 2015 17 November 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

M3000M has an age advantage of 9 months, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M3000M and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 377 votes

Rate Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000M or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.