RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Quadro M3000 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM204GA107
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2016 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed540 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1207 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate34.5696.56
Floating-point processing power1.106 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache384 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.28.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2016 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt

M3000 SE has 26.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M3000 SE and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M3000 SE is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
Quadro M3000 SE
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000 SE or RTX A2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.