Radeon Graphics 448SP vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Power efficiency11.32no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102Renoir
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840448
Core clock speed1506 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate394.853.20
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs24028
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)IGP
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1127 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2016 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 448SP has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P6000 and Radeon Graphics 448SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 119 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 87 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or Radeon Graphics 448SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.