Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Quadro M2200

Place in the ranking	424	218
Place by popularity	not in top-100	85
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	58.33
Power efficiency	13.89	16.04
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GM206	Navi 24
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1024
Core clock speed	695 MHz	2610 MHz
Boost clock speed	1036 MHz	2815 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	107 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	180.2
Floating-point processing power	2.122 TFLOPS	5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1377 MHz	2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	143.9 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.04

RX 6500 XT 24.80
+125%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4258

RX 6500 XT 9565
+125%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M2200 7372

RX 6500 XT 22954
+211%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro M2200 24622

RX 6500 XT 76445
+210%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M2200 5850

RX 6500 XT 15712
+169%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M2200 37796

RX 6500 XT 91909
+143%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M2200 289176

RX 6500 XT 356129
+23.2%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Quadro M2200 47

RX 6500 XT 111
+136%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Quadro M2200 86

RX 6500 XT 140
+62.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Quadro M2200 58

RX 6500 XT 87
+48.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Quadro M2200 72

RX 6500 XT 150
+108%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Quadro M2200 69

RX 6500 XT 91
+32.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Quadro M2200 25

RX 6500 XT 58
+134%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Quadro M2200 33

RX 6500 XT 67
+105%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Quadro M2200 5

RX 6500 XT 60
+1052%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	44 −43.2%	63 +43.2%
1440p	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
4K	14 −21.4%	17 +21.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.16
1440p	no data	6.63
4K	no data	11.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−324%

72
+324%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −200%	51 +200%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −131%	80−85 +131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −218%	54 +218%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −119%	55−60 +119%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −110%	65−70 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −98.6%	140−150 +98.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −93.2%	110−120 +93.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −106%	60−65 +106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −133%	80−85 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −56.1%	100−110 +56.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −153%	43 +153%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −131%	80−85 +131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −100%	34 +100%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −119%	55−60 +119%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −110%	65−70 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −98.6%	140−150 +98.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −93.2%	110−120 +93.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −106%	60−65 +106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −197%	107 +197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −82.8%	50−55 +82.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −56.1%	100−110 +56.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −82.4%	31 +82.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −76.5%	30 +76.5%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −119%	55−60 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −98.6%	140−150 +98.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −55.9%	92 +55.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −131%	83 +131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −170%	54 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +164%	25 −164%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−106%

60−65
+106%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −124%	45−50 +124%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −124%	35−40 +124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −229%	23 +229%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −155%	27−30 +155%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	17 +240%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −115%	27−30 +115%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −176%	140−150 +176%
Hitman 3	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −187%	66 +187%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −235%	57 +235%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −250%	56 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −103%	140−150 +103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−128%

40−45
+128%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −138%	18−20 +138%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −154%	120−130 +154%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −211%	27−30 +211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −115%	28 +115%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4 +300%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −150%	10 +150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−110%

21−24
+110%

This is how Quadro M2200 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 43% faster in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 150% faster in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro M2200 is 164% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 324% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro M2200 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RX 6500 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.04	24.80
Recency	11 January 2017	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	107 Watt

Quadro M2200 has 94.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, has a 124.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.