Radeon RX 460 Mobile vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with Radeon RX 460 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
11.01
+8.9%

Quadro M2200 outperforms RX 460 Mobile by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking394412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameN17P-Q3Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 January 2017 (7 years ago)8 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86
Current price$1967 $95 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024896
Core clock speed694 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1180 MHz
Number of transistors1870 Million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate66.3066.08
Floating-point performanceno data2,115 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 460 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5508 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSyncno data+
Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.01
+8.9%
RX 460 Mobile 10.11

Quadro M2200 outperforms Radeon RX 460 Mobile by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 7372
RX 460 Mobile 7793
+5.7%

Radeon RX 460 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 6% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 5850
+14.5%
RX 460 Mobile 5108

Quadro M2200 outperforms Radeon RX 460 Mobile by 15% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 37796
+20.8%
RX 460 Mobile 31294

Quadro M2200 outperforms Radeon RX 460 Mobile by 21% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro M2200 289176
+200%
RX 460 Mobile 96383

Quadro M2200 outperforms Radeon RX 460 Mobile by 200% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+19.4%
36
−19.4%
4K13
+30%
10−12
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how Quadro M2200 and RX 460 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M2200 is 19% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M2200 is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.01 10.11
Recency 13 January 2017 8 August 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 460 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 299 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.