RTX A2000 12 GB vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with RTX A2000 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.29

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms M2200 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking428141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.41
Power efficiency13.7935.03
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM206GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243328
Core clock speed695 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate66.30124.8
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs64104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.28.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 10.29
RTX A2000 12 GB 33.27
+223%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4241
RTX A2000 12 GB 13713
+223%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−202%
130−140
+202%
4K14
−221%
45−50
+221%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.45
4Kno data9.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−217%
95−100
+217%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−210%
90−95
+210%
Valorant 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Dota 2 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Fortnite 60−65
−213%
200−210
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−217%
95−100
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−221%
270−280
+221%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−210%
90−95
+210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Valorant 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
World of Tanks 150−160
−223%
500−550
+223%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−206%
110−120
+206%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
Dota 2 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−218%
140−150
+218%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−221%
270−280
+221%
Valorant 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−216%
180−190
+216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
World of Tanks 75−80
−216%
250−260
+216%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−218%
70−75
+218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Valorant 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Fortnite 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Valorant 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%

This is how Quadro M2200 and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 202% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 221% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.29 33.27
Recency 11 January 2017 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro M2200 has 27.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 223.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 378 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 145 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.