HD Graphics 400 vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with HD Graphics 400, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.20
+881%

M2200 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 881% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4641121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.1413.21
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGM206Braswell GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102496
Core clock speed695 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate66.307.200
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs322
TMUs6412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1377 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.3
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M2200 10.20
+881%
HD Graphics 400 1.04

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M2200 5850
+1200%
HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+975%
4−5
−975%
4K14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+1020%
5−6
−1020%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+1020%
5−6
−1020%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Fortnite 60−65
+933%
6−7
−933%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1025%
4−5
−1025%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Valorant 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+1020%
5−6
−1020%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+1000%
14−16
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Dota 2 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Fortnite 60−65
+933%
6−7
−933%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1025%
4−5
−1025%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Valorant 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Dota 2 70−75
+943%
7−8
−943%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1025%
4−5
−1025%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
Valorant 95−100
+978%
9−10
−978%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+933%
6−7
−933%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+888%
8−9
−888%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Valorant 110−120
+1030%
10−11
−1030%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Sons of the Forest 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Sons of the Forest 7−8 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

This is how Quadro M2200 and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M2200 is 975% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M2200 is 1300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.20 1.04
Recency 11 January 2017 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 6 Watt

Quadro M2200 has a 880.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 816.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 400 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 431 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 442 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2200 or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.